Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | IC Markets★ Our Pick | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Regulation | ASIC (Australia) | ASIC (Australia) |
| Reg. Tier | Tier-1 Regulated | Tier-1 Regulated |
| Min Deposit | $200 | $0 (recommended $200) |
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.0 pips avg (Raw ECN) | 0.17 pips avg (Razor ECN) |
| Commission | $7/lot round turn (MT5) | $7/lot round turn |
| Max Leverage | Up to 1:500 | Up to 1:500 |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView |
| Founded | 2007 | 2010 |
| Our Rating | 4.7/5 | 4.7/5 |
Data accurate as of Q1 2026. Verify current terms with each broker directly.
Key Differences
Why IC Markets wins
Where Pepperstone is stronger
Regulation & Safety
Winner: IC MarketsIC Markets is regulated by ASIC (Australia), CySEC (Cyprus), FSA (Seychelles). This places it in the Tier-1 Regulated category — the highest standard of retail investor protection, with mandatory client fund segregation, negative balance protection, and access to compensation schemes where applicable.
Pepperstone holds licences from ASIC (Australia), FCA (UK), CySEC (Cyprus), BaFin (Germany), DFSA (UAE), CMA (Kenya), making it Tier-1 Regulated. With 6 Tier-1 regulators, Pepperstone meets the highest standards of retail broker oversight.
Both brokers operate under comparable Tier-1 Regulated frameworks — a tie on regulatory safety. The practical difference comes down to jurisdiction: choose the entity that operates under your country's local regulator for maximum protection.
Trading Costs — The Real Numbers
Winner: IC MarketsTrading costs are where many brokers win or lose active traders. On a standard EUR/USD 1-lot trade ($100,000 notional), the all-in cost breaks down as follows: IC Markets charges a spread of 0.0 pips avg (Raw ECN) (approximately $0) plus $7/lot round turn (MT5) commission — totalling roughly $7 per lot round turn.
Pepperstone runs 0.17 pips avg (Razor ECN) spread with $7/lot round turn — an all-in cost of approximately $9 per lot. Over 100 lots per month, the difference adds up to roughly $170 in favour of IC Markets.
IC Markets wins on trading costs. IC Markets's 0.0 pips avg (Raw ECN) structure and $7/lot round turn (MT5) make it the more cost-efficient choice for active traders — particularly those trading multiple lots daily. Pepperstone's pricing suits traders who value predictability over rock-bottom spreads.
Platforms & Tools
Winner: PepperstoneIC Markets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader. This multi-platform approach gives traders genuine flexibility — from algorithmic trading on MT5 to discretionary charting on MetaTrader 4.
Pepperstone offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView. The combination of MetaTrader and TradingView covers virtually every trading style.
For beginners: Pepperstone wins — its platform is more approachable. For active traders: Pepperstone has the edge with TradingView integration and advanced charting. For algo traders: IC Markets is better placed, offering cTrader's native algo environment alongside MT5. Overall platform winner: Pepperstone (4 platforms vs 3).
Execution Quality
Winner: IC MarketsExecution model matters for scalpers, news traders, and anyone trading large size. IC Markets operates as a ECN (Electronic Communications Network) broker — routing orders directly to liquidity providers with no dealing desk intervention, which means tighter spreads during normal conditions and no re-quotes.
Pepperstone runs a ECN (Electronic Communications Network) model. With $7/lot round turn per lot and 0.17 pips avg (Razor ECN) spreads, Pepperstone passes raw interbank pricing to clients — ideal for high-frequency and algorithmic strategies. On speed and slippage: Pepperstone reports execution in sub-50ms for standard orders, with no restrictions on scalping or EA use.
Execution winner: IC Markets — scoring 10/10 versus Pepperstone's 9/10. IC Markets's ECN (Electronic Communications Network) model is better suited to active traders. Pepperstone's execution remains adequate for retail strategies but is not optimised for professional-level frequency or volume.
Minimum Deposit & Account Opening
Winner: IC MarketsGetting started matters. IC Markets requires a minimum deposit of $200. The $200 minimum is moderate — accessible to most retail traders but a meaningful commitment for beginners.
Pepperstone starts at $0 (recommended $200). The $0 (recommended $200) threshold is on the higher side — worth noting for traders with limited starting capital. Account opening is typically completed online in under 24 hours for both brokers.
On accessibility: IC Markets wins — $200 to start vs $0 (recommended $200). If capital efficiency matters, IC Markets lets you begin trading with less at risk.
Who Should Choose Which?
★ Choose IC Markets if...
Choose Pepperstone if...
Our Verdict
IC Markets wins this comparison
IC Markets wins this comparison with a 4.7/5 rating against Pepperstone's 4.7/5. Professional scalpers and algo traders who need top-tier regulation and deep ECN liquidity. Pepperstone remains a strong choice for traders who want maximum regulatory protection combined with professional ecn pricing. Neither is a bad broker — the right pick comes down to your specific priorities.
Read full reviews
Compare more brokers
Open Your NextTrade Account in 3 Minutes
Raw ECN spreads from 0.0 pips. $50 minimum deposit. MT5 platform. No dealing desk.
You'll be redirected to dashboard.nexttrade.com · Affiliate link · CFD trading involves risk