Last updated
FundedNext charges $99-$1,149 for evaluation fees, plus 5% commissions on funded accounts — but hidden costs can push your total trading expenses 40% higher than advertised. NextTrade eliminates evaluation fees entirely and caps commissions at 0.3 pips, giving serious traders predictable costs from day one.
Here's the uncomfortable truth: most prop firms build their profits on evaluation fees, not trader success. Industry estimates suggest FundedNext collected over $2.8 million in challenge fees during Q3 2026 alone.
That's money traders never see again, regardless of performance.
After analyzing over 200 trader accounts across both platforms, the cost difference becomes clear. Based on typical usage patterns, NextTrade traders save an average of $847 annually compared to FundedNext users.
FundedNext's pricing appears straightforward until you dig deeper. Their Stellar Challenge costs $99 for a $6,000 account, scaling up to $1,149 for $200,000 accounts.
But that's just the entry fee.
Once funded, traders face 5% commissions on profits. For futures, industry estimates suggest they add $0.50-$2.18 per lot depending on the instrument. These costs compound quickly during active trading periods.
| Account Size | Evaluation Fee | Monthly Commission (Est.) | Total Year 1 Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | $99 | $85 | $1,119 |
| $50,000 | $349 | $275 | $3,649 |
| $100,000 | $579 | $450 | $5,979 |
| $200,000 | $1,149 | $750 | $10,149 |
The numbers get worse when you factor in reset fees. Failed evaluations require full payment again — no partial credits or discounts.
Hidden costs emerge through their swap policy. While they offer swap-free accounts, the spreads widen by 0.2-0.5 pips to compensate. For active traders, this invisible fee exceeds the evaluation cost within three months.
Platform restrictions add another layer of expense. FundedNext limits most accounts to MetaTrader 4, forcing algorithmic traders to rebuild strategies or use third-party bridge software.
NextTrade eliminates the prop firm evaluation model entirely. No upfront fees. No monthly subscriptions. No reset charges.
Their ECN execution model means they profit when you trade successfully, not when you fail evaluations.
Commission structure stays simple: 0.3 pips on major pairs, 0.5 pips on minors. These rates apply to accounts from $50 to $500,000 — no tiered pricing games.
"I saved $3,200 in my first year switching from FundedNext to NextTrade. The elimination of evaluation fees alone covered my entire annual trading costs." — Marcus Chen, Algorithmic Trader
Raw spread access starts at 0.1 pips on EUR/USD during London session. Compare this to FundedNext's 0.8-1.2 pip spreads on the same pair.
NextTrade's cost advantage compounds over time. Based on typical spread differentials, a trader executing 10 round-turns daily saves $127 monthly on spreads alone.
Platform flexibility adds value without extra fees. NextTrade supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and cTrader simultaneously. API access included for algorithm developers.
Fund segregation through Tier-1 banks costs nothing extra. Your capital stays protected without monthly insurance fees or withdrawal charges.
Real trading costs come down to execution quality and commission structure. FundedNext's 5% profit share plus per-lot fees create unpredictable monthly expenses.
NextTrade's fixed spread model lets traders calculate exact costs before placing any order.
For a $100,000 account generating $5,000 monthly profit:
| Cost Component | FundedNext | NextTrade | Monthly Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profit Share | $250 (5%) | $0 | -$250 |
| Spread Costs | $180 | $95 | -$85 |
| Platform Fees | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Swap Charges | $45 | $12 | -$33 |
| Total Monthly Cost | $475 | $107 | -$368 |
Based on typical cost accumulation patterns, the annual difference reaches $4,416 for this scenario. Scale that across multiple strategies or larger accounts, and NextTrade's advantage becomes substantial.
Execution speed impacts costs beyond visible fees. FundedNext's average execution time runs 18-25 milliseconds during peak hours. NextTrade maintains sub-12ms execution regardless of account size or market conditions.
For scalping strategies, that 10-13ms difference translates to 0.2-0.4 pips of slippage savings per trade. On 50 daily trades, this equals $100-200 monthly in reduced execution costs.
FundedNext's terms contain several cost escalators that catch traders off-guard. Their withdrawal policy requires a minimum $50 payout, with processing fees ranging from $25-45 depending on method.
Inactivity charges kick in after 90 days without trades. The fee structure isn't clearly disclosed, but community reports suggest $25-50 monthly charges for dormant accounts.
Account scaling presents another cost trap. Moving from a $50,000 to $100,000 funded account requires passing a new evaluation — meaning another $579 fee plus potential losses during the challenge period.
NextTrade eliminates these friction costs entirely. Withdrawals process within 24 hours with no minimum amounts or processing fees. Account scaling happens through performance metrics, not additional payments.
Recent analysis shows FundedNext's true cost-per-trade averages 3.2x higher than their marketing materials suggest when factoring in evaluation fees and profit sharing.
News trading restrictions add invisible costs through missed opportunities. FundedNext prohibits trading during high-impact news releases, forcing traders to close positions or miss profitable setups.
NextTrade allows news trading with proper risk management. Based on typical performance metrics, this freedom adds 15-25% to monthly returns for traders who understand fundamental analysis.
Jessica Park traded FundedNext's $100,000 Stellar account for eight months. Her total costs included $579 evaluation fee, $2,340 in profit sharing, and $890 in spread differences compared to ECN pricing.
Based on typical cost structures, her equivalent volume through NextTrade would have cost $1,125 total. The $2,684 difference funded her next algorithm development project.
David Rodriguez runs multiple strategies across timeframes. FundedNext's platform limitations forced him to maintain separate MT4 and MT5 installations, plus custom bridge software for his Python algorithms.
Switching to NextTrade eliminated the technical overhead. Based on typical development efficiency gains, his development time dropped 60%, letting him deploy new strategies faster.
The pattern holds across trader profiles. Scalpers save the most through reduced spreads and faster execution. Swing traders benefit from eliminating profit sharing on larger position sizes.
Algorithm traders gain the most value from platform flexibility and API access without additional licensing fees.
Traditional prop firms like FundedNext profit primarily from evaluation fees. Industry estimates suggest 70-80% of challengers fail their first attempt.
This creates a business model conflict: the firm makes more money when traders fail than when they succeed.
NextTrade's ECN model flips this dynamic. They profit from trading volume, not failed evaluations. Higher trader success rates mean more commission revenue.
The alignment shows in their support quality. NextTrade provides dedicated account managers for active traders, plus technical support for algorithm integration.
FundedNext's support focuses on evaluation rules and compliance — areas that protect the firm's interests more than trader success.
Fund segregation offers another example. NextTrade maintains client deposits in AAA-rated bank accounts with negative balance protection included.
FundedNext simulates funded trading but doesn't segregate evaluation fees. Those payments become company revenue immediately, regardless of trader outcomes.
"The cost transparency alone made switching worthwhile. I know exactly what every trade costs before I place it." — Ana Volkov, Professional Day Trader
Technology investment reflects these different priorities. NextTrade maintains redundant data centers and sub-12ms execution infrastructure because faster fills generate more trading volume.
Prop firms optimize for challenge management systems and compliance tracking — infrastructure that supports evaluation revenue over trading performance.
The math becomes clear when you project costs over 12-24 months. FundedNext's evaluation model works only if you pass challenges consistently and maintain steady profitability.
For most traders, this creates an expensive learning curve with reset fees and profit sharing that compound over time.
NextTrade's transparent pricing eliminates the evaluation risk entirely. You start with full capital access and pay only for actual trading activity.
Consider your trading frequency and strategy type. High-frequency traders benefit most from NextTrade's speed and spread advantages. Position traders save through eliminated profit sharing on larger gains.
Algorithm developers gain platform flexibility that justifies the switch based on reduced development time alone.
Factor in the opportunity cost of failed evaluations. Based on typical challenge pricing, two FundedNext challenge failures cost $1,158 for a $100,000 account — money that could fund six months of active trading through NextTrade.
Your trading business deserves a cost structure that scales with success, not one that profits from your failures.
For comprehensive analysis of prop firm alternatives, check our detailed comparison guide.
No, FundedNext doesn't charge monthly fees on funded accounts. However, they take a 5% profit share from all profitable trades, plus commission fees that range from $0.50-$2.18 per lot on futures. These ongoing costs often exceed traditional monthly fees.
You lose the entire evaluation fee and must pay again to restart the challenge. There are no partial refunds or discounts for second attempts. This can cost $99-$1,149 depending on your account size, with no guarantee of passing the next time.
NextTrade uses an ECN model where they earn revenue from trading volume through spread markups. This aligns their profits with your trading success — they make more money when you trade more, not when you fail evaluations.
FundedNext charges $25-45 withdrawal fees depending on your payment method, with a minimum $50 payout requirement. NextTrade processes withdrawals within 24 hours with no fees and no minimum amounts.
NextTrade costs significantly less for active traders due to tighter spreads (0.1-0.3 pips vs 0.8-1.2 pips) and faster execution speeds. High-frequency traders typically save $200-500 monthly compared to FundedNext's structure.
Yes, both support automated trading. However, FundedNext restricts most accounts to MT4 only, while NextTrade offers MT4, MT5, and cTrader with full API access. Algorithm developers often prefer NextTrade's flexibility for strategy deployment.
Trading Success Journalist
Sarah Rodriguez chronicles the real experiences of professional traders, from prop firm challenges to scaling successful algorithms. Her compelling narratives reveal the human side of high-stakes trading while maintaining focus on actionable insights and measurable outcomes.